Demographics details for Crossett, AR vs Indian trail, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crossett, AR vs Indian trail, NC.
| Data | Crossett | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,613 | 41,724 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $41,250 | $95,101 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Crossett vs Indian trail
- The population in Indian trail is higher at 41,724, compared to 4,613 in Crossett.
- Residents in Crossett have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 36.1 years in Indian trail.
- Indian trail has a higher median income of $95,101, compared to $41,250 in Crossett.
- In Indian trail, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 40.0% in Crossett.
- Crossett has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The unemployment rate in Crossett is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.8% in Indian trail.
Demographics
Demographics Crossett vs Indian trail provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crossett | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 9 |
| White | 51 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crossett vs Indian trail
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crossett at 45% compared to 9% in Indian trail.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Indian trail at 71% compared to 51% in Crossett.
- In Indian trail, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Crossett.
- Indian trail has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Indian trail at 6%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crossett and Indian trail at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crossett | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 25.8% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crossett vs Indian trail
- More residents in Crossett report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 14.6% in Indian trail.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crossett at 26.2% compared to 22.0% in Indian trail.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crossett at 25.8% compared to 13.5% in Indian trail.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 12.6% in Crossett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crossett at 44.0% compared to 31.2% in Indian trail.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crossett at 27.0% compared to 7.0% in Indian trail.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crossett | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (40) | 0.7% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (1,191) | 12.8% (5,353) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (653) | 6.6% (2,761) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (687) | 24.4% (10,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crossett vs Indian trail
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Indian trail.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 12.8% in Indian trail.
- More residents in Crossett have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 6.6% in Indian trail.
- In Indian trail, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 14.9% in Crossett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.