Demographics details for Crossett, AR vs Fort dodge, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crossett, AR vs Fort dodge, IA.
| Data | Crossett | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,613 | 24,657 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $41,250 | $59,452 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 19% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Crossett vs Fort dodge
- The population in Fort dodge is higher at 24,657, compared to 4,613 in Crossett.
- Residents in Crossett have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 37.2 years in Fort dodge.
- Fort dodge has a higher median income of $59,452, compared to $41,250 in Crossett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crossett at 40.0% compared to 31.0% in Fort dodge.
- Crossett has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 0% in Fort dodge.
- The unemployment rate in Crossett is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Fort dodge.
Demographics
Demographics Crossett vs Fort dodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crossett | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 45 | 5 |
| White | 51 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crossett vs Fort dodge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crossett at 45% compared to 5% in Fort dodge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort dodge at 79% compared to 51% in Crossett.
- In Fort dodge, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Crossett.
- Fort dodge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort dodge at 7%, compared to 2% in Crossett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crossett and Fort dodge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crossett | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 25.8% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.6% | 21.2% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crossett vs Fort dodge
- More residents in Crossett report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 16.6% in Fort dodge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crossett at 26.2% compared to 19.3% in Fort dodge.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crossett at 25.8% compared to 20.1% in Fort dodge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort dodge at 21.2% compared to 12.6% in Crossett.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crossett at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Fort dodge.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crossett at 27.0% compared to 15.0% in Fort dodge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crossett | Fort dodge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (40) | 0.7% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (1,191) | 18.8% (4,633) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (653) | 12.2% (2,998) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (687) | 13.8% (3,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crossett vs Fort dodge
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 18.8% in Fort dodge.
- More residents in Crossett have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 12.2% in Fort dodge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crossett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 13.8% in Fort dodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.