Demographics details for Cross plains, TX vs Okemah, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cross plains, TX vs Okemah, OK.
Data | Cross plains | Okemah |
---|---|---|
Population | 926 | 3,010 |
Median Age | 28.3 years | 34.1 years |
Median Income | $48,516 | $34,882 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cross plains vs Okemah
- The population in Okemah is higher at 3,010, compared to 926 in Cross plains.
- The median age in Okemah is higher at 34.1 years, compared to 28.3 years in Cross plains.
- Cross plains has a higher median income of $48,516 compared to $34,882 in Okemah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cross plains at 47.0% compared to 28.0% in Okemah.
- The poverty level is higher in Okemah at 20%, compared to 13% in Cross plains.
- Okemah has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Cross plains.
Demographics
Demographics Cross plains vs Okemah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cross plains | Okemah |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 90 | 54 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Cross plains vs Okemah
- In Okemah, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Cross plains.
- Cross plains has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 54% in Okemah.
- Both Cross plains and Okemah have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Okemah has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Cross plains.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Okemah at 14%, compared to 4% in Cross plains.
- In Okemah, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 0% in Cross plains.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cross plains | Okemah |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 22.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 17.5% |
Depression | 25.7% | 28.0% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 29.3% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 13.1% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 43.8% |
Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cross plains vs Okemah
- In Okemah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 18.3% in Cross plains.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Okemah at 28.0% versus 25.7% in Cross plains.
- Okemah has a higher smoking rate at 29.3% compared to 18.1% in Cross plains.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cross plains at 19.6% compared to 13.1% in Okemah.
- Okemah has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 36.1% in Cross plains.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cross plains at 32.0% compared to 17.0% in Okemah.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cross plains | Okemah |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 0.4% (11) |
High School Diploma | 19.3% (179) | 24.8% (746) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (56) | 17.5% (528) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (85) | 6.1% (183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cross plains vs Okemah
- In Okemah, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Cross plains.
- In Okemah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 19.3% in Cross plains.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Okemah at 17.5%, compared to 6.0% in Cross plains.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross plains hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.2% compared to 6.1% in Okemah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.