Demographics details for Cross plains, TX vs Massapequa park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cross plains, TX vs Massapequa park, NY.

Data Cross plains Massapequa park
Population 926 16,873
Median Age 28.3 years 43.7 years
Median Income $48,516 $161,193
Married Families 47.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 13% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Cross plains vs Massapequa park

  • The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 926 in Cross plains.
  • The median age in Massapequa park is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 28.3 years in Cross plains.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $48,516 in Cross plains.
  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 47.0% in Cross plains.
  • Cross plains has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in Cross plains is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Cross plains vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cross plains Massapequa park
Black Data is updating 1
White 90 88
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 6 5
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cross plains vs Massapequa park

  • In Massapequa park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Cross plains.
  • Cross plains has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 88% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cross plains.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cross plains at 6% compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • Both Cross plains and Massapequa park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cross plains and Massapequa park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cross plains Massapequa park
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 8.0%
Depression 25.7% 17.9%
Smoking 18.1% 11.5%
Binge Drinking 19.6% 19.2%
Obesity 36.1% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 32.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cross plains vs Massapequa park

  • More residents in Cross plains report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cross plains at 25.7% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cross plains at 18.1% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cross plains at 19.6% compared to 19.2% in Massapequa park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Cross plains at 36.1% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cross plains at 32.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cross plains Massapequa park
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.3% (45)
High School Diploma 19.3% (179) 15.3% (2,586)
Less than High School 6.0% (56) 3.8% (641)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (85) 36.6% (6,183)

Education Levels Comparison: Cross plains vs Massapequa park

  • In Massapequa park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Cross plains.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cross plains hold a high school diploma at 19.3% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents in Cross plains have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 9.2% in Cross plains.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.