Demographics details for Cross plains, TX vs Fillmore, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cross plains, TX vs Fillmore, NY.
Data | Cross plains | Fillmore |
---|---|---|
Population | 926 | 652 |
Median Age | 28.3 years | 45.2 years |
Median Income | $48,516 | $70,677 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cross plains vs Fillmore
- In Cross plains, the population is higher at 926, compared to 652 in Fillmore.
- The median age in Fillmore is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 28.3 years in Cross plains.
- Fillmore has a higher median income of $70,677, compared to $48,516 in Cross plains.
- In Fillmore, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 47.0% in Cross plains.
- Cross plains has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Fillmore.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cross plains and Fillmore at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Cross plains vs Fillmore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cross plains | Fillmore |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 90 | 99 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cross plains vs Fillmore
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Cross plains and Fillmore at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fillmore at 99% compared to 90% in Cross plains.
- Both Cross plains and Fillmore have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cross plains at 6% compared to 0% in Fillmore.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cross plains at 4% compared to 1% in Fillmore.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cross plains and Fillmore at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cross plains | Fillmore |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 11.7% |
Depression | 25.7% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 22.4% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cross plains vs Fillmore
- More residents in Cross plains report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Fillmore.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fillmore at 25.9% versus 25.7% in Cross plains.
- Fillmore has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 18.1% in Cross plains.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cross plains at 19.6% compared to 19.4% in Fillmore.
- Fillmore has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 36.1% in Cross plains.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cross plains at 32.0% compared to 8.0% in Fillmore.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cross plains | Fillmore |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.3% (179) | 21.6% (141) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (56) | 0.9% (6) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (85) | 21.8% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cross plains vs Fillmore
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross plains have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Fillmore.
- In Fillmore, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 19.3% in Cross plains.
- More residents in Cross plains have less than a high school education at 6.0% compared to 0.9% in Fillmore.
- In Fillmore, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 9.2% in Cross plains.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.