Demographics details for Cross city, FL vs Union, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cross city, FL vs Union, OR.
| Data | Cross city | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,754 | 26,177 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $44,500 | $61,946 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cross city vs Union
- The population in Union is higher at 26,177, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
- Residents in Cross city have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 39.7 years in Union.
- Union has a higher median income of $61,946, compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cross city at 47.0% compared to 42.0% in Union.
- Cross city has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 11% in Union.
- Union has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Cross city.
Demographics
Demographics Cross city vs Union provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cross city | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cross city vs Union
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cross city at 20% compared to 1% in Union.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union at 88% compared to 61% in Cross city.
- The Asian population is larger in Cross city at 2% compared to 1% in Union.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cross city at 9% compared to 5% in Union.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cross city at 8% compared to 4% in Union.
- In Union, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cross city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cross city | Union |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 29.1% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 35.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cross city vs Union
- More residents in Cross city report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 18.5% in Union.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union at 27.8% versus 23.8% in Cross city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cross city at 29.1% compared to 17.0% in Union.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Union at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in Cross city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cross city at 40.8% compared to 35.4% in Union.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 17.0% in Union.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cross city | Union |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (15) | 0.6% (146) |
| High School Diploma | 39.2% (688) | 18.6% (4,878) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (205) | 9.1% (2,380) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (136) | 16.0% (4,194) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cross city vs Union
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross city have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Union.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross city hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 18.6% in Union.
- More residents in Cross city have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 9.1% in Union.
- In Union, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.