Demographics details for Cross city, FL vs Tishomingo, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cross city, FL vs Tishomingo, OK.
Data | Cross city | Tishomingo |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,754 | 3,115 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 30.2 years |
Median Income | $44,500 | $32,063 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 22.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cross city vs Tishomingo
- The population in Tishomingo is higher at 3,115, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
- Residents in Cross city have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 30.2 years in Tishomingo.
- Cross city has a higher median income of $44,500 compared to $32,063 in Tishomingo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cross city at 47.0% compared to 22.0% in Tishomingo.
- Cross city has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 14% in Tishomingo.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cross city and Tishomingo at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cross city vs Tishomingo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cross city | Tishomingo |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 4 |
White | 61 | 56 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 18 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Cross city vs Tishomingo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cross city at 20% compared to 4% in Tishomingo.
- Cross city has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 56% in Tishomingo.
- The Asian population is larger in Cross city at 2% compared to 0% in Tishomingo.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cross city and Tishomingo at 9%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tishomingo at 18%, compared to 8% in Cross city.
- In Tishomingo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Cross city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cross city | Tishomingo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 14.3% |
Depression | 23.8% | 27.1% |
Smoking | 29.1% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 40.8% | 42.2% |
Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cross city vs Tishomingo
- In Tishomingo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 20.0% in Cross city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tishomingo at 27.1% versus 23.8% in Cross city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cross city at 29.1% compared to 22.8% in Tishomingo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cross city at 14.8% compared to 13.9% in Tishomingo.
- Tishomingo has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 40.8% in Cross city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 23.0% in Tishomingo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cross city | Tishomingo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (15) | 0.4% (13) |
High School Diploma | 39.2% (688) | 14.1% (438) |
Less than High School | 11.7% (205) | 10.5% (328) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (136) | 13.2% (412) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cross city vs Tishomingo
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross city have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Tishomingo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross city hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 14.1% in Tishomingo.
- More residents in Cross city have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 10.5% in Tishomingo.
- In Tishomingo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.