Demographics details for Cross city, FL vs Temple city, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cross city, FL vs Temple city, CA.
| Data | Cross city | Temple city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,754 | 35,296 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $44,500 | $95,263 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Cross city vs Temple city
- The population in Temple city is higher at 35,296, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
- The median age in Temple city is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 40.2 years in Cross city.
- Temple city has a higher median income of $95,263, compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cross city at 47.0% compared to 44.0% in Temple city.
- Cross city has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Temple city.
- Temple city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Cross city.
Demographics
Demographics Cross city vs Temple city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cross city | Temple city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | Data is updating |
| White | 61 | 7 |
| Asian | 2 | 67 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cross city vs Temple city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cross city at 20% compared to 0% in Temple city.
- Cross city has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 7% in Temple city.
- In Temple city, the Asian population stands at 67%, greater than 2% in Cross city.
- Temple city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 9% in Cross city.
- Both Cross city and Temple city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cross city and Temple city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cross city | Temple city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 12.6% |
| Smoking | 29.1% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 20.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cross city vs Temple city
- More residents in Cross city report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 12.9% in Temple city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cross city at 23.8% compared to 12.6% in Temple city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cross city at 29.1% compared to 9.3% in Temple city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cross city at 14.8% compared to 12.4% in Temple city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cross city at 40.8% compared to 20.1% in Temple city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 9.0% in Temple city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cross city | Temple city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (15) | 2.1% (724) |
| High School Diploma | 39.2% (688) | 14.7% (5,202) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (205) | 11.4% (4,037) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (136) | 30.7% (10,834) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cross city vs Temple city
- In Temple city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.9% in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross city hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 14.7% in Temple city.
- More residents in Cross city have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 11.4% in Temple city.
- In Temple city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.