Demographics details for Cross city, FL vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cross city, FL vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Cross city | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,754 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $44,500 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Cross city vs Loves park
- The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
- Residents in Cross city have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cross city at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- Cross city has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Cross city.
Demographics
Demographics Cross city vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cross city | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 7 |
| White | 61 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cross city vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cross city at 20% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 61% in Cross city.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Cross city.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 9% in Cross city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 8% in Cross city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cross city and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cross city | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 29.1% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cross city vs Loves park
- More residents in Cross city report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cross city at 23.8% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cross city at 29.1% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Cross city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cross city at 40.8% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cross city | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (15) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 39.2% (688) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (205) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.8% (136) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cross city vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross city have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cross city hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 17.1% in Loves park.
- More residents in Cross city have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.