Demographics details for Cross city, FL vs Lashmeet, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cross city, FL vs Lashmeet, WV.

Data Cross city Lashmeet
Population 1,754 704
Median Age 40.2 years 61.1 years
Median Income $44,500 $43,701
Married Families 47.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 18% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Cross city vs Lashmeet

  • In Cross city, the population is higher at 1,754, compared to 704 in Lashmeet.
  • The median age in Lashmeet is higher at 61.1 years, compared to 40.2 years in Cross city.
  • Cross city has a higher median income of $44,500 compared to $43,701 in Lashmeet.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cross city at 47.0% compared to 38.0% in Lashmeet.
  • Cross city has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
  • Lashmeet has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Cross city.

Demographics

Demographics Cross city vs Lashmeet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cross city Lashmeet
Black 20 Data is updating
White 61 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 9 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cross city vs Lashmeet

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cross city at 20% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Lashmeet at 100% compared to 61% in Cross city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cross city at 2% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Cross city at 9% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Cross city at 8% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cross city and Lashmeet at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cross city Lashmeet
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 25.1%
Physical Health Not Good 15.8% 19.0%
Depression 23.8% 32.6%
Smoking 29.1% 27.7%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 12.2%
Obesity 40.8% 45.6%
Disability Percentage 32.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cross city vs Lashmeet

  • In Lashmeet, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 25.1% compared to 20.0% in Cross city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lashmeet at 32.6% versus 23.8% in Cross city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Cross city at 29.1% compared to 27.7% in Lashmeet.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Cross city at 14.8% compared to 12.2% in Lashmeet.
  • Lashmeet has higher obesity rates at 45.6% compared to 40.8% in Cross city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 22.0% in Lashmeet.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cross city Lashmeet
No Schooling 0.9% (15) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 39.2% (688) 25.3% (178)
Less than High School 11.7% (205) 47.2% (332)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.8% (136) 5.8% (41)

Education Levels Comparison: Cross city vs Lashmeet

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cross city have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Lashmeet.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cross city hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 25.3% in Lashmeet.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lashmeet at 47.2%, compared to 11.7% in Cross city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cross city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.8% compared to 5.8% in Lashmeet.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.