Demographics details for Crosbyton, TX vs Springer, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crosbyton, TX vs Springer, OK.
| Data | Crosbyton | Springer |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,461 | 694 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 30.3 years |
| Median Income | $47,083 | $51,630 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Crosbyton vs Springer
- In Crosbyton, the population is higher at 1,461, compared to 694 in Springer.
- Residents in Crosbyton have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 30.3 years in Springer.
- Springer has a higher median income of $51,630, compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crosbyton at 44.0% compared to 42.0% in Springer.
- Crosbyton has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 17% in Springer.
- Springer has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.
Demographics
Demographics Crosbyton vs Springer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crosbyton | Springer |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 6 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 75 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 13 |
Demographics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Springer
- In Springer, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Crosbyton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Springer at 54% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- Both Crosbyton and Springer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crosbyton at 75% compared to 7% in Springer.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springer at 21%, compared to 16% in Crosbyton.
- In Springer, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Crosbyton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crosbyton | Springer |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Springer
- More residents in Crosbyton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Springer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springer at 26.0% versus 23.6% in Crosbyton.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Crosbyton and Springer at 20.5%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Springer at 15.6% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crosbyton at 42.7% compared to 39.9% in Springer.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springer at 29.0% compared to 26.0% in Crosbyton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crosbyton | Springer |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (359) | 19.2% (133) |
| Less than High School | 37.1% (542) | 19.6% (136) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (129) | 9.4% (65) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crosbyton vs Springer
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Springer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 19.2% in Springer.
- More residents in Crosbyton have less than a high school education at 37.1% compared to 19.6% in Springer.
- In Springer, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.4% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.