Demographics details for Crosbyton, TX vs Pittsburg, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crosbyton, TX vs Pittsburg, KS.
| Data | Crosbyton | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,461 | 20,658 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 25.7 years |
| Median Income | $47,083 | $42,371 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Crosbyton vs Pittsburg
- The population in Pittsburg is higher at 20,658, compared to 1,461 in Crosbyton.
- Residents in Crosbyton have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 25.7 years in Pittsburg.
- Crosbyton has a higher median income of $47,083 compared to $42,371 in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crosbyton at 44.0% compared to 28.0% in Pittsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Pittsburg at 23%, compared to 22% in Crosbyton.
- The unemployment rate in Crosbyton is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Pittsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Crosbyton vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crosbyton | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 6 | 78 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 75 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Pittsburg
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Crosbyton and Pittsburg at 3%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pittsburg at 78% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Crosbyton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crosbyton at 75% compared to 11% in Pittsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Crosbyton at 16% compared to 5% in Pittsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crosbyton and Pittsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crosbyton | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.2% in Crosbyton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pittsburg at 25.0% versus 23.6% in Crosbyton.
- Pittsburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 20.5% in Crosbyton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pittsburg at 19.7% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
- Pittsburg has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 42.7% in Crosbyton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Pittsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crosbyton | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (30) | 0.7% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (359) | 13.0% (2,686) |
| Less than High School | 37.1% (542) | 5.9% (1,222) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (129) | 17.2% (3,562) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crosbyton vs Pittsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
- More residents in Crosbyton have less than a high school education at 37.1% compared to 5.9% in Pittsburg.
- In Pittsburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.