Demographics details for Crosbyton, TX vs Lauderhill, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crosbyton, TX vs Lauderhill, FL.
| Data | Crosbyton | Lauderhill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,461 | 73,633 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $47,083 | $48,523 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Crosbyton vs Lauderhill
- The population in Lauderhill is higher at 73,633, compared to 1,461 in Crosbyton.
- Residents in Crosbyton have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 37.0 years in Lauderhill.
- Lauderhill has a higher median income of $48,523, compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crosbyton at 44.0% compared to 28.0% in Lauderhill.
- Crosbyton has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 16% in Lauderhill.
- Lauderhill has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Crosbyton.
Demographics
Demographics Crosbyton vs Lauderhill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crosbyton | Lauderhill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 80 |
| White | 6 | 3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 75 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Lauderhill
- In Lauderhill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 80% compared to 3% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has a higher percentage of White residents at 6% compared to 3% in Lauderhill.
- In Lauderhill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Crosbyton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crosbyton at 75% compared to 9% in Lauderhill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Crosbyton at 16% compared to 6% in Lauderhill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crosbyton and Lauderhill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crosbyton | Lauderhill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Lauderhill
- More residents in Crosbyton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.7% in Lauderhill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crosbyton at 23.6% compared to 17.0% in Lauderhill.
- Lauderhill has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 20.5% in Crosbyton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crosbyton at 15.4% compared to 12.1% in Lauderhill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crosbyton at 42.7% compared to 37.0% in Lauderhill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 12.0% in Lauderhill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crosbyton | Lauderhill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (30) | 2.1% (1,544) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (359) | 22.7% (16,679) |
| Less than High School | 37.1% (542) | 10.9% (8,046) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (129) | 13.4% (9,833) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crosbyton vs Lauderhill
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Crosbyton and Lauderhill at 2.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 22.7% in Lauderhill.
- More residents in Crosbyton have less than a high school education at 37.1% compared to 10.9% in Lauderhill.
- In Lauderhill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.