Demographics details for Crosbyton, TX vs Douglas, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crosbyton, TX vs Douglas, NE.
| Data | Crosbyton | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,461 | 171 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $47,083 | $65,000 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Crosbyton vs Douglas
- In Crosbyton, the population is higher at 1,461, compared to 171 in Douglas.
- Residents in Crosbyton have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 33.4 years in Douglas.
- Douglas has a higher median income of $65,000, compared to $47,083 in Crosbyton.
- In Douglas, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 44.0% in Crosbyton.
- Crosbyton has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- The unemployment rate in Crosbyton is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.5% in Douglas.
Demographics
Demographics Crosbyton vs Douglas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crosbyton | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 6 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Douglas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crosbyton at 3% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Douglas at 97% compared to 6% in Crosbyton.
- In Douglas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Crosbyton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crosbyton at 75% compared to 0% in Douglas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Crosbyton at 16% compared to 2% in Douglas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crosbyton and Douglas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crosbyton | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 42.7% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crosbyton vs Douglas
- More residents in Crosbyton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.7% in Douglas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crosbyton at 23.6% compared to 18.5% in Douglas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crosbyton at 20.5% compared to 13.6% in Douglas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Douglas at 23.1% compared to 15.4% in Crosbyton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crosbyton at 42.7% compared to 36.8% in Douglas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crosbyton at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Douglas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crosbyton | Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (359) | 10.5% (18) |
| Less than High School | 37.1% (542) | 38.6% (66) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (129) | 11.1% (19) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crosbyton vs Douglas
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Douglas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crosbyton hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 10.5% in Douglas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Douglas at 38.6%, compared to 37.1% in Crosbyton.
- In Douglas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.8% in Crosbyton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.