Demographics details for Crook, CO vs San dimas, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crook, CO vs San dimas, CA.
| Data | Crook | San dimas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 126 | 33,535 |
| Median Age | 56.0 years | 42.7 years |
| Median Income | $23,500 | $102,241 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Crook vs San dimas
- The population in San dimas is higher at 33,535, compared to 126 in Crook.
- Residents in Crook have a higher median age of 56.0 years compared to 42.7 years in San dimas.
- San dimas has a higher median income of $102,241, compared to $23,500 in Crook.
- In San dimas, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 21.0% in Crook.
- Crook has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in San dimas.
- San dimas has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.0% in Crook.
Demographics
Demographics Crook vs San dimas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crook | San dimas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 90 | 25 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Crook vs San dimas
- In San dimas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Crook.
- Crook has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 25% in San dimas.
- In San dimas, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Crook.
- San dimas has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 10% in Crook.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San dimas at 18%, compared to 0% in Crook.
- In San dimas, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Crook.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crook | San dimas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 26.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crook vs San dimas
- More residents in Crook report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.6% in San dimas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crook at 21.6% compared to 16.6% in San dimas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crook at 17.6% compared to 9.3% in San dimas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crook at 21.7% compared to 16.7% in San dimas.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crook at 28.4% compared to 26.3% in San dimas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crook at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in San dimas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crook | San dimas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (4) | 1.1% (362) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (18) | 13.8% (4,634) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (26) | 8.5% (2,851) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (11) | 28.3% (9,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crook vs San dimas
- A higher percentage of residents in Crook have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.1% in San dimas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crook hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 13.8% in San dimas.
- More residents in Crook have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 8.5% in San dimas.
- In San dimas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.3% compared to 8.7% in Crook.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.