Demographics details for Crook, CO vs Florence, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crook, CO vs Florence, OR.
| Data | Crook | Florence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 126 | 9,376 |
| Median Age | 56.0 years | 57.7 years |
| Median Income | $23,500 | $57,568 |
| Married Families | 21.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Crook vs Florence
- The population in Florence is higher at 9,376, compared to 126 in Crook.
- The median age in Florence is higher at 57.7 years, compared to 56.0 years in Crook.
- Florence has a higher median income of $57,568, compared to $23,500 in Crook.
- In Florence, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 21.0% in Crook.
- Crook has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Florence.
- Florence has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Crook.
Demographics
Demographics Crook vs Florence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crook | Florence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 90 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Crook vs Florence
- In Florence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Crook.
- Crook has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 87% in Florence.
- In Florence, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Crook.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crook at 10% compared to 5% in Florence.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Florence at 3%, compared to 0% in Crook.
- In Florence, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Crook.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crook | Florence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 29.2% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 28.4% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crook vs Florence
- In Florence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.7% in Crook.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Florence at 29.2% versus 21.6% in Crook.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crook at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Florence.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crook at 21.7% compared to 17.0% in Florence.
- Florence has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 28.4% in Crook.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Florence at 25.0% compared to 18.0% in Crook.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crook | Florence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (4) | 0.4% (35) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (18) | 14.2% (1,331) |
| Less than High School | 20.6% (26) | 15.6% (1,467) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (11) | 19.9% (1,865) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crook vs Florence
- A higher percentage of residents in Crook have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.4% in Florence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crook hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 14.2% in Florence.
- More residents in Crook have less than a high school education at 20.6% compared to 15.6% in Florence.
- In Florence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 8.7% in Crook.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.