Demographics details for Cresco, IA vs Jurupa valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cresco, IA vs Jurupa valley, CA.
| Data | Cresco | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,940 | 107,609 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $60,135 | $91,562 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Cresco vs Jurupa valley
- The population in Jurupa valley is higher at 107,609, compared to 3,940 in Cresco.
- Residents in Cresco have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562, compared to $60,135 in Cresco.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cresco at 44.0% compared to 34.0% in Jurupa valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Jurupa valley at 12%, compared to 9% in Cresco.
- Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Cresco.
Demographics
Demographics Cresco vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cresco | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 97 | 8 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 71 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cresco vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Cresco.
- Cresco has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- In Jurupa valley, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Cresco.
- Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 1% in Cresco.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jurupa valley at 13%, compared to 2% in Cresco.
- In Jurupa valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cresco.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cresco | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cresco vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Cresco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cresco at 19.0% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cresco at 18.1% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cresco at 21.5% compared to 16.1% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 35.2% in Cresco.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cresco at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cresco | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.1% (3,376) |
| High School Diploma | 28.3% (1,115) | 17.3% (18,582) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (258) | 34.3% (36,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (556) | 9.0% (9,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cresco vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cresco hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 6.5% in Cresco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cresco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.