Demographics details for Cresco, IA vs Hoover, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cresco, IA vs Hoover, AL.
| Data | Cresco | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,940 | 92,435 |
| Median Age | 39.5 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $60,135 | $101,765 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Cresco vs Hoover
- The population in Hoover is higher at 92,435, compared to 3,940 in Cresco.
- Residents in Cresco have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765, compared to $60,135 in Cresco.
- In Hoover, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 44.0% in Cresco.
- Cresco has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Hoover.
- The unemployment rate in Cresco is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Cresco vs Hoover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cresco | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 20 |
| White | 97 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cresco vs Hoover
- In Hoover, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Cresco.
- Cresco has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 67% in Hoover.
- In Hoover, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Cresco.
- Hoover has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Cresco.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hoover at 3%, compared to 2% in Cresco.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cresco and Hoover at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cresco | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cresco vs Hoover
- More residents in Cresco report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.9% in Hoover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hoover at 21.3% versus 19.0% in Cresco.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cresco at 18.1% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cresco at 21.5% compared to 16.7% in Hoover.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cresco at 35.2% compared to 32.1% in Hoover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cresco at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cresco | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (583) |
| High School Diploma | 28.3% (1,115) | 7.3% (6,787) |
| Less than High School | 6.5% (258) | 3.8% (3,478) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (556) | 41.1% (38,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cresco vs Hoover
- In Hoover, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cresco hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- More residents in Cresco have less than a high school education at 6.5% compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- In Hoover, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 14.1% in Cresco.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.