Demographics details for Crawfordsville, IN vs Wapakoneta, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crawfordsville, IN vs Wapakoneta, OH.

Data Crawfordsville Wapakoneta
Population 16,479 9,776
Median Age 36.7 years 41.6 years
Median Income $46,918 $63,008
Married Families 32.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 13% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Wapakoneta

  • In Crawfordsville, the population is higher at 16,479, compared to 9,776 in Wapakoneta.
  • The median age in Wapakoneta is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 36.7 years in Crawfordsville.
  • Wapakoneta has a higher median income of $63,008, compared to $46,918 in Crawfordsville.
  • In Wapakoneta, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • Crawfordsville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Wapakoneta.
  • Wapakoneta has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Crawfordsville.

Demographics

Demographics Crawfordsville vs Wapakoneta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crawfordsville Wapakoneta
Black 1 1
White 84 89
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 5
Two or More Races 6 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Wapakoneta

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Crawfordsville and Wapakoneta at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wapakoneta at 89% compared to 84% in Crawfordsville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Crawfordsville at 1% compared to 0% in Wapakoneta.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Crawfordsville at 8% compared to 5% in Wapakoneta.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Crawfordsville at 6% compared to 5% in Wapakoneta.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crawfordsville and Wapakoneta at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crawfordsville Wapakoneta
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 12.3%
Depression 26.1% 23.8%
Smoking 21.8% 21.3%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 18.8%
Obesity 37.0% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Wapakoneta

  • In Wapakoneta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Crawfordsville at 26.1% compared to 23.8% in Wapakoneta.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crawfordsville at 21.8% compared to 21.3% in Wapakoneta.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wapakoneta at 18.8% compared to 16.6% in Crawfordsville.
  • Wapakoneta has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 37.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Crawfordsville at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Wapakoneta.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crawfordsville Wapakoneta
No Schooling 0.7% (114) 0.1% (9)
High School Diploma 23.1% (3,814) 26.9% (2,625)
Less than High School 19.9% (3,274) 11.8% (1,157)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (1,714) 14.0% (1,364)

Education Levels Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Wapakoneta

  • A higher percentage of residents in Crawfordsville have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Wapakoneta.
  • In Wapakoneta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 23.1% in Crawfordsville.
  • More residents in Crawfordsville have less than a high school education at 19.9% compared to 11.8% in Wapakoneta.
  • In Wapakoneta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.0% compared to 10.4% in Crawfordsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.