Demographics details for Crawfordsville, IN vs Freeland, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crawfordsville, IN vs Freeland, WA.

Data Crawfordsville Freeland
Population 16,479 1,894
Median Age 36.7 years 51.2 years
Median Income $46,918 $89,868
Married Families 32.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 13% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Freeland

  • In Crawfordsville, the population is higher at 16,479, compared to 1,894 in Freeland.
  • The median age in Freeland is higher at 51.2 years, compared to 36.7 years in Crawfordsville.
  • Freeland has a higher median income of $89,868, compared to $46,918 in Crawfordsville.
  • In Freeland, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 32.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • Crawfordsville has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Freeland.
  • Freeland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Crawfordsville.

Demographics

Demographics Crawfordsville vs Freeland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crawfordsville Freeland
Black 1 3
White 84 86
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 8 3
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Freeland

  • In Freeland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Freeland at 86% compared to 84% in Crawfordsville.
  • Both Crawfordsville and Freeland have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Crawfordsville at 8% compared to 3% in Freeland.
  • Both Crawfordsville and Freeland have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • In Freeland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Crawfordsville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crawfordsville Freeland
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 9.2%
Depression 26.1% 25.5%
Smoking 21.8% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 18.0%
Obesity 37.0% 29.6%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Freeland

  • More residents in Crawfordsville report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.8% in Freeland.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Crawfordsville at 26.1% compared to 25.5% in Freeland.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crawfordsville at 21.8% compared to 11.8% in Freeland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Freeland at 18.0% compared to 16.6% in Crawfordsville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Crawfordsville at 37.0% compared to 29.6% in Freeland.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Freeland at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Crawfordsville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crawfordsville Freeland
No Schooling 0.7% (114) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 23.1% (3,814) 8.1% (153)
Less than High School 19.9% (3,274) 8.7% (164)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (1,714) 28.9% (548)

Education Levels Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Freeland

  • A higher percentage of residents in Crawfordsville have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Freeland.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crawfordsville hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 8.1% in Freeland.
  • More residents in Crawfordsville have less than a high school education at 19.9% compared to 8.7% in Freeland.
  • In Freeland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 10.4% in Crawfordsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.