Demographics details for Crawfordsville, IN vs Corsicana, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crawfordsville, IN vs Corsicana, TX.

Data Crawfordsville Corsicana
Population 16,479 25,566
Median Age 36.7 years 34.6 years
Median Income $46,918 $49,353
Married Families 32.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 13% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.9

Population Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Corsicana

  • The population in Corsicana is higher at 25,566, compared to 16,479 in Crawfordsville.
  • Residents in Crawfordsville have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 34.6 years in Corsicana.
  • Corsicana has a higher median income of $49,353, compared to $46,918 in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Crawfordsville and Corsicana at 32.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Corsicana at 14%, compared to 13% in Crawfordsville.
  • Corsicana has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Crawfordsville.

Demographics

Demographics Crawfordsville vs Corsicana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crawfordsville Corsicana
Black 1 17
White 84 38
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 8 34
Two or More Races 6 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Corsicana

  • In Corsicana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 1% in Crawfordsville.
  • Crawfordsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 38% in Corsicana.
  • Both Crawfordsville and Corsicana have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Corsicana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 8% in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corsicana at 10%, compared to 6% in Crawfordsville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crawfordsville and Corsicana at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crawfordsville Corsicana
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 18.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% 13.6%
Depression 26.1% 23.5%
Smoking 21.8% 19.9%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.8%
Obesity 37.0% 40.1%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Corsicana

  • In Corsicana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Crawfordsville at 26.1% compared to 23.5% in Corsicana.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crawfordsville at 21.8% compared to 19.9% in Corsicana.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Corsicana at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Crawfordsville.
  • Corsicana has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 37.0% in Crawfordsville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Crawfordsville at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Corsicana.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crawfordsville Corsicana
No Schooling 0.7% (114) 3.7% (957)
High School Diploma 23.1% (3,814) 14.2% (3,633)
Less than High School 19.9% (3,274) 25.3% (6,461)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.4% (1,714) 9.2% (2,357)

Education Levels Comparison: Crawfordsville vs Corsicana

  • In Corsicana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.7% in Crawfordsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crawfordsville hold a high school diploma at 23.1% compared to 14.2% in Corsicana.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corsicana at 25.3%, compared to 19.9% in Crawfordsville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crawfordsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 9.2% in Corsicana.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.