Demographics details for Crawford, TX vs Woodbury, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, TX vs Woodbury, VT.
| Data | Crawford | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 913 | 887 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $78,333 | $75,000 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Woodbury
- In Crawford, the population is higher at 913, compared to 887 in Woodbury.
- The median age in Woodbury is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 44.1 years in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher median income of $78,333 compared to $75,000 in Woodbury.
- In Woodbury, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 54.0% in Crawford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Crawford and Woodbury at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Crawford is higher at 3.6%, compared to 2.0% in Woodbury.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Woodbury provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crawford | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Woodbury
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crawford at 2% compared to 0% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodbury at 95% compared to 88% in Crawford.
- In Woodbury, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Crawford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crawford at 7% compared to 2% in Woodbury.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Crawford at 3% compared to 1% in Woodbury.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crawford and Woodbury at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crawford | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.1% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Woodbury
- More residents in Crawford report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crawford at 24.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crawford at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crawford at 33.5% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crawford at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crawford | Woodbury |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.7% (262) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (32) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (105) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Woodbury
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Crawford and Woodbury at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- More residents in Crawford have less than a high school education at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 0.0% in Woodbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.