Demographics details for Crawford, TX vs Valdosta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, TX vs Valdosta, GA.
| Data | Crawford | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 913 | 55,074 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 29.2 years |
| Median Income | $78,333 | $41,365 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Valdosta
- The population in Valdosta is higher at 55,074, compared to 913 in Crawford.
- Residents in Crawford have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
- Crawford has a higher median income of $78,333 compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crawford at 54.0% compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- The poverty level is higher in Valdosta at 19%, compared to 5% in Crawford.
- Valdosta has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.6% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Valdosta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crawford | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 56 |
| White | 88 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 2% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
- In Valdosta, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Crawford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crawford at 7% compared to 5% in Valdosta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Valdosta at 4%, compared to 3% in Crawford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crawford and Valdosta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crawford | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 15.4% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 13.0% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.0% in Crawford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crawford at 24.1% compared to 22.2% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 13.1% in Crawford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 33.5% in Crawford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crawford at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Valdosta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crawford | Valdosta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (538) |
| High School Diploma | 28.7% (262) | 16.3% (8,967) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (32) | 8.9% (4,906) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (105) | 15.9% (8,750) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 16.3% in Valdosta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Valdosta at 8.9%, compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
- In Valdosta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 11.5% in Crawford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.