Demographics details for Crawford, TX vs Snoqualmie, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, TX vs Snoqualmie, WA.
| Data | Crawford | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 913 | 13,621 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $78,333 | $186,353 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Snoqualmie
- The population in Snoqualmie is higher at 13,621, compared to 913 in Crawford.
- Residents in Crawford have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 38.6 years in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353, compared to $78,333 in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crawford at 54.0% compared to 53.0% in Snoqualmie.
- Crawford has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
- The unemployment rate in Crawford is higher at 3.6%, compared to 3.5% in Snoqualmie.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Snoqualmie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crawford | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 88 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 11 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Snoqualmie
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Crawford at 2% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 77% in Snoqualmie.
- In Snoqualmie, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Crawford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crawford at 7% compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Snoqualmie at 7%, compared to 3% in Crawford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crawford and Snoqualmie at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crawford | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 4.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Snoqualmie
- More residents in Crawford report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crawford at 24.1% compared to 23.9% in Snoqualmie.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crawford at 13.1% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 19.3% in Snoqualmie.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crawford at 33.5% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crawford at 12.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crawford | Snoqualmie |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (34) |
| High School Diploma | 28.7% (262) | 5.8% (792) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (32) | 1.5% (209) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (105) | 45.3% (6,177) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Snoqualmie
- In Snoqualmie, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
- More residents in Crawford have less than a high school education at 3.5% compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- In Snoqualmie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 11.5% in Crawford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.