Demographics details for Crawford, TX vs Iuka, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, TX vs Iuka, MS.
| Data | Crawford | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 913 | 3,096 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $78,333 | $43,887 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Iuka
- The population in Iuka is higher at 3,096, compared to 913 in Crawford.
- Residents in Crawford have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 37.2 years in Iuka.
- Crawford has a higher median income of $78,333 compared to $43,887 in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crawford at 54.0% compared to 40.0% in Iuka.
- The poverty level is higher in Iuka at 22%, compared to 5% in Crawford.
- Iuka has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.6% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Iuka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crawford | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 88 | 94 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Iuka
- In Iuka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Crawford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Iuka at 94% compared to 88% in Crawford.
- Both Crawford and Iuka have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crawford at 7% compared to 0% in Iuka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Crawford at 3% compared to 2% in Iuka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crawford and Iuka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crawford | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 13.1% | 25.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 33.5% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Iuka
- In Iuka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.0% in Crawford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Iuka at 26.4% versus 24.1% in Crawford.
- Iuka has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 13.1% in Crawford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 14.6% in Iuka.
- Iuka has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 33.5% in Crawford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Iuka at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Crawford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crawford | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.4% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 28.7% (262) | 19.9% (616) |
| Less than High School | 3.5% (32) | 21.0% (650) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (105) | 11.2% (348) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Iuka
- In Iuka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a high school diploma at 28.7% compared to 19.9% in Iuka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Iuka at 21.0%, compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 11.2% in Iuka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.