Demographics details for Crawford, NE vs Sherwood, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, NE vs Sherwood, MI.
| Data | Crawford | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 838 | 286 |
| Median Age | 52.1 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $54,167 | $53,092 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 61.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Sherwood
- In Crawford, the population is higher at 838, compared to 286 in Sherwood.
- Residents in Crawford have a higher median age of 52.1 years compared to 34.3 years in Sherwood.
- Crawford has a higher median income of $54,167 compared to $53,092 in Sherwood.
- In Sherwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 60.0% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Sherwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crawford | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 76 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | 6 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Sherwood
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Crawford and Sherwood at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sherwood at 92% compared to 76% in Crawford.
- Both Crawford and Sherwood have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crawford at 15% compared to 1% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sherwood at 6%, compared to 3% in Crawford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Crawford at 6% compared to 1% in Sherwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crawford | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Sherwood
- In Sherwood, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sherwood at 25.7% versus 18.9% in Crawford.
- Sherwood has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 15.7% in Crawford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 18.4% in Sherwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crawford at 40.3% compared to 39.5% in Sherwood.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sherwood at 26.0% compared to 14.0% in Crawford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crawford | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (5) | 2.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 30.2% (253) | 39.2% (112) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (50) | 45.1% (129) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (143) | 2.4% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Sherwood
- In Sherwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.6% in Crawford.
- In Sherwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 30.2% in Crawford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sherwood at 45.1%, compared to 6.0% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 2.4% in Sherwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.