Demographics details for Crawford, NE vs Jim falls, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, NE vs Jim falls, WI.
| Data | Crawford | Jim falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 838 | 219 |
| Median Age | 52.1 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $54,167 | $87,143 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Jim falls
- In Crawford, the population is higher at 838, compared to 219 in Jim falls.
- Residents in Crawford have a higher median age of 52.1 years compared to 40.6 years in Jim falls.
- Jim falls has a higher median income of $87,143, compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crawford at 60.0% compared to 53.0% in Jim falls.
- Crawford has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Jim falls.
- Jim falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Jim falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crawford | Jim falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 76 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Jim falls
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Crawford and Jim falls at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jim falls at 100% compared to 76% in Crawford.
- Both Crawford and Jim falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crawford at 15% compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Crawford at 3% compared to 0% in Jim falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Crawford at 6% compared to 0% in Jim falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crawford | Jim falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 25.0% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Jim falls
- In Jim falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jim falls at 24.5% versus 18.9% in Crawford.
- Jim falls has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 15.7% in Crawford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jim falls at 25.0% compared to 20.0% in Crawford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crawford at 40.3% compared to 34.0% in Jim falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jim falls at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Crawford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crawford | Jim falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (5) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 30.2% (253) | 14.2% (31) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (50) | 13.7% (30) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (143) | 21.5% (47) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Jim falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Jim falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a high school diploma at 30.2% compared to 14.2% in Jim falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jim falls at 13.7%, compared to 6.0% in Crawford.
- In Jim falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 17.1% in Crawford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.