Demographics details for Crawford, NE vs Harlingen, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, NE vs Harlingen, TX.
| Data | Crawford | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 838 | 71,678 |
| Median Age | 52.1 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $54,167 | $50,367 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Harlingen
- The population in Harlingen is higher at 71,678, compared to 838 in Crawford.
- Residents in Crawford have a higher median age of 52.1 years compared to 33.2 years in Harlingen.
- Crawford has a higher median income of $54,167 compared to $50,367 in Harlingen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crawford at 60.0% compared to 32.0% in Harlingen.
- The poverty level is higher in Harlingen at 18%, compared to 10% in Crawford.
- Harlingen has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Harlingen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crawford | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 76 | -5 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 83 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 19 |
| American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to -5% in Harlingen.
- In Harlingen, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Crawford.
- Harlingen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 83%, compared to 15% in Crawford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harlingen at 19%, compared to 3% in Crawford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Crawford at 6% compared to 0% in Harlingen.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crawford | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harlingen at 20.1% versus 18.9% in Crawford.
- Harlingen has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Crawford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 16.3% in Harlingen.
- Harlingen has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 40.3% in Crawford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harlingen at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Crawford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crawford | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (5) | 2.1% (1,536) |
| High School Diploma | 30.2% (253) | 13.6% (9,737) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (50) | 26.2% (18,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (143) | 12.8% (9,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.6% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a high school diploma at 30.2% compared to 13.6% in Harlingen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harlingen at 26.2%, compared to 6.0% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 12.8% in Harlingen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.