Demographics details for Crawford, NE vs Gordon, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, NE vs Gordon, GA.
| Data | Crawford | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 838 | 58,954 |
| Median Age | 52.1 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $54,167 | $57,555 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Gordon
- The population in Gordon is higher at 58,954, compared to 838 in Crawford.
- Residents in Crawford have a higher median age of 52.1 years compared to 39.1 years in Gordon.
- Gordon has a higher median income of $57,555, compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crawford at 60.0% compared to 41.0% in Gordon.
- The poverty level is higher in Gordon at 20%, compared to 10% in Crawford.
- Gordon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Gordon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crawford | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 76 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 15 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | 6 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Gordon
- In Gordon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 71% in Gordon.
- In Gordon, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Crawford.
- Gordon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 15% in Crawford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gordon at 6%, compared to 3% in Crawford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Crawford at 6% compared to 2% in Gordon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crawford | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Gordon
- In Gordon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gordon at 23.1% versus 18.9% in Crawford.
- Gordon has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 15.7% in Crawford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 15.7% in Gordon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crawford at 40.3% compared to 37.2% in Gordon.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Crawford and Gordon at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crawford | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (5) | 1.6% (918) |
| High School Diploma | 30.2% (253) | 17.8% (10,497) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (50) | 28.5% (16,793) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (143) | 11.1% (6,523) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Gordon
- In Gordon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a high school diploma at 30.2% compared to 17.8% in Gordon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gordon at 28.5%, compared to 6.0% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 11.1% in Gordon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.