Demographics details for Crawford, NE vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crawford, NE vs Cedar lake, IN.
Data | Crawford | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Population | 838 | 15,592 |
Median Age | 52.1 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $54,167 | $84,444 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Crawford vs Cedar lake
- The population in Cedar lake is higher at 15,592, compared to 838 in Crawford.
- Residents in Crawford have a higher median age of 52.1 years compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
- Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $54,167 in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crawford at 60.0% compared to 40.0% in Cedar lake.
- Crawford has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Crawford and Cedar lake at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Crawford vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Crawford | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 76 | 94 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 15 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
American Indian | 6 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crawford vs Cedar lake
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Crawford and Cedar lake at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 76% in Crawford.
- Both Crawford and Cedar lake have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crawford at 15% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- Both Crawford and Cedar lake have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Crawford at 6% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Crawford | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.1% |
Depression | 18.9% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 18.8% |
Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 19.8% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crawford vs Cedar lake
- In Cedar lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Crawford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 18.9% in Crawford.
- Cedar lake has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 15.7% in Crawford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 19.8% in Cedar lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crawford at 40.3% compared to 37.2% in Cedar lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crawford at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Crawford | Cedar lake |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (5) | 0.4% (67) |
High School Diploma | 30.2% (253) | 21.1% (3,292) |
Less than High School | 6.0% (50) | 7.1% (1,102) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.1% (143) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crawford vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a high school diploma at 30.2% compared to 21.1% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar lake at 7.1%, compared to 6.0% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crawford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.