Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Cranston | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,421 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $83,123 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Union city
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 27,895 in Union city.
- Residents in Cranston have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranston at 37.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 8% in Cranston.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.5% in Cranston.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranston | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 85 |
| White | 61 | 6 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 5% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranston at 9% compared to 4% in Union city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Union city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranston | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Union city
- In Union city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Union city has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Cranston and Union city at 12.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranston | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Cranston have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 17.3% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.