Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Roberts, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Roberts, MT.
| Data | Cranston | Roberts |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,421 | 281 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $83,123 | $76,688 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Roberts
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 281 in Roberts.
- Residents in Cranston have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 39.5 years in Roberts.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $76,688 in Roberts.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranston at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Roberts.
- The poverty level is higher in Roberts at 9%, compared to 8% in Cranston.
- The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Roberts.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Roberts provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranston | Roberts |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 61 | 92 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Roberts
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cranston at 5% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roberts at 92% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 0% in Roberts.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranston at 9% compared to 8% in Roberts.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Roberts at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranston | Roberts |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 13.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 23.3% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 29.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Roberts
- More residents in Cranston report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.7% in Roberts.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 23.0% in Roberts.
- Roberts has a higher smoking rate at 13.9% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Roberts at 23.3% compared to 18.6% in Cranston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cranston at 29.8% compared to 29.4% in Roberts.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Roberts at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranston | Roberts |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 12.8% (36) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 15.7% (44) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 19.9% (56) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Roberts
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Roberts.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 12.8% in Roberts.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roberts at 15.7%, compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 19.9% in Roberts.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.