Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Perrysburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Perrysburg, OH.
| Data | Cranston | Perrysburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,421 | 25,161 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $83,123 | $98,419 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Perrysburg
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 25,161 in Perrysburg.
- Residents in Cranston have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 38.9 years in Perrysburg.
- Perrysburg has a higher median income of $98,419, compared to $83,123 in Cranston.
- In Perrysburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Perrysburg.
- The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Perrysburg.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Perrysburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranston | Perrysburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 61 | 87 |
| Asian | 7 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Perrysburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cranston at 5% compared to 2% in Perrysburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Perrysburg at 87% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 3% in Perrysburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 4% in Perrysburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranston at 9% compared to 4% in Perrysburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Perrysburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranston | Perrysburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Perrysburg
- More residents in Cranston report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.3% in Perrysburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 22.5% in Perrysburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cranston at 13.5% compared to 12.1% in Perrysburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Perrysburg at 19.0% compared to 18.6% in Cranston.
- Perrysburg has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cranston at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Perrysburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranston | Perrysburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 0.2% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 8.7% (2,192) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 2.6% (645) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 38.5% (9,689) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Perrysburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Perrysburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 8.7% in Perrysburg.
- More residents in Cranston have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 2.6% in Perrysburg.
- In Perrysburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.5% compared to 24.7% in Cranston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.