Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Merrimac, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Merrimac, WI.
| Data | Cranston | Merrimac |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,421 | 526 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $83,123 | $86,250 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Merrimac
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 526 in Merrimac.
- Residents in Cranston have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 38.0 years in Merrimac.
- Merrimac has a higher median income of $86,250, compared to $83,123 in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranston at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Merrimac.
- Cranston has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Merrimac.
- The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Merrimac.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Merrimac provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranston | Merrimac |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 4 |
| White | 61 | 84 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Merrimac
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cranston at 5% compared to 4% in Merrimac.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Merrimac at 84% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 0% in Merrimac.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 8% in Merrimac.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranston at 9% compared to 4% in Merrimac.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Merrimac at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranston | Merrimac |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 24.0% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Merrimac
- More residents in Cranston report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.8% in Merrimac.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 23.6% in Merrimac.
- Merrimac has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Merrimac at 24.0% compared to 18.6% in Cranston.
- Merrimac has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Merrimac at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranston | Merrimac |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 20.2% (106) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 22.8% (120) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 21.1% (111) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Merrimac
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Merrimac.
- In Merrimac, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Merrimac at 22.8%, compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 21.1% in Merrimac.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.