Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Loganville, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Loganville, WI.
Data | Cranston | Loganville |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,421 | 295 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 46.0 years |
Median Income | $83,123 | $77,750 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Loganville
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 295 in Loganville.
- The median age in Loganville is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $77,750 in Loganville.
- In Loganville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- The poverty level is identical in both Cranston and Loganville at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.0% in Loganville.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Loganville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cranston | Loganville |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 2 |
White | 61 | 93 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 18 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Loganville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cranston at 5% compared to 2% in Loganville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loganville at 93% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 0% in Loganville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 1% in Loganville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranston at 9% compared to 3% in Loganville.
- In Loganville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cranston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cranston | Loganville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 10.6% |
Depression | 24.9% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 24.0% |
Obesity | 29.8% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Loganville
- In Loganville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 24.1% in Loganville.
- Loganville has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loganville at 24.0% compared to 18.6% in Cranston.
- Loganville has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cranston at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Loganville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cranston | Loganville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 18.3% (54) |
Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 10.2% (30) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 10.8% (32) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Loganville
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Loganville.
- In Loganville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- More residents in Cranston have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 10.2% in Loganville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 10.8% in Loganville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.