Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Johnson city, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Johnson city, TX.

Data Cranston Johnson city
Population 82,421 1,826
Median Age 39.9 years 43.5 years
Median Income $83,123 $45,160
Married Families 37.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 8% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Cranston vs Johnson city

  • In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 1,826 in Johnson city.
  • The median age in Johnson city is higher at 43.5 years, compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
  • Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $45,160 in Johnson city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranston at 37.0% compared to 28.0% in Johnson city.
  • Cranston has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Johnson city.
  • The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Johnson city.

Demographics

Demographics Cranston vs Johnson city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cranston Johnson city
Black 5 1
White 61 51
Asian 7 2
Hispanic 18 28
Two or More Races 9 18
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Johnson city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cranston at 5% compared to 1% in Johnson city.
  • Cranston has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 51% in Johnson city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 2% in Johnson city.
  • Johnson city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 28%, compared to 18% in Cranston.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Johnson city at 18%, compared to 9% in Cranston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Johnson city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cranston Johnson city
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 10.2%
Depression 24.9% 22.6%
Smoking 13.5% 14.2%
Binge Drinking 18.6% 20.0%
Obesity 29.8% 34.8%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Johnson city

  • In Johnson city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 22.6% in Johnson city.
  • Johnson city has a higher smoking rate at 14.2% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Johnson city at 20.0% compared to 18.6% in Cranston.
  • Johnson city has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Johnson city at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cranston Johnson city
No Schooling 1.1% (930) 0.6% (11)
High School Diploma 16.1% (13,246) 14.7% (269)
Less than High School 13.4% (11,048) 22.7% (414)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.7% (20,330) 13.9% (254)

Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Johnson city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Johnson city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 14.7% in Johnson city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Johnson city at 22.7%, compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 13.9% in Johnson city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.