Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Hazel park, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Hazel park, MI.
| Data | Cranston | Hazel park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,421 | 14,838 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $83,123 | $59,576 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Hazel park
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 14,838 in Hazel park.
- Residents in Cranston have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 37.2 years in Hazel park.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $59,576 in Hazel park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranston at 37.0% compared to 30.0% in Hazel park.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazel park at 15%, compared to 8% in Cranston.
- The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Hazel park.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Hazel park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranston | Hazel park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 10 |
| White | 61 | 72 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Hazel park
- In Hazel park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hazel park at 72% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 2% in Hazel park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 6% in Hazel park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hazel park at 10%, compared to 9% in Cranston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Hazel park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranston | Hazel park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Hazel park
- In Hazel park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 24.2% in Hazel park.
- Hazel park has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Hazel park.
- Hazel park has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel park at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranston | Hazel park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 1.0% (152) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 21.1% (3,127) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 16.1% (2,395) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 16.9% (2,511) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Hazel park
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Hazel park.
- In Hazel park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazel park at 16.1%, compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 16.9% in Hazel park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.