Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Frankfort, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Frankfort, KY.
Data | Cranston | Frankfort |
---|---|---|
Population | 82,421 | 28,391 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 34.2 years |
Median Income | $83,123 | $53,905 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Frankfort
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 28,391 in Frankfort.
- Residents in Cranston have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 34.2 years in Frankfort.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $53,905 in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranston at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Frankfort.
- The poverty level is higher in Frankfort at 12%, compared to 8% in Cranston.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Cranston and Frankfort at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Frankfort provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Cranston | Frankfort |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 12 |
White | 61 | 71 |
Asian | 7 | 3 |
Hispanic | 18 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Frankfort at 71% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 3% in Frankfort.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 6% in Frankfort.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranston at 9% compared to 8% in Frankfort.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Frankfort at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Cranston | Frankfort |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 13.0% |
Depression | 24.9% | 26.4% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 19.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 29.8% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Frankfort
- In Frankfort, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Frankfort at 26.4% versus 24.9% in Cranston.
- Frankfort has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 14.5% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Cranston | Frankfort |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 0.3% (89) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 15.3% (4,339) |
Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 11.5% (3,279) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 18.7% (5,295) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Frankfort
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 15.3% in Frankfort.
- More residents in Cranston have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 11.5% in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 18.7% in Frankfort.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.