Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Davisboro, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Davisboro, GA.
| Data | Cranston | Davisboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,421 | 1,906 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $83,123 | $45,647 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Davisboro
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 1,906 in Davisboro.
- Residents in Cranston have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 37.5 years in Davisboro.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $45,647 in Davisboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranston at 37.0% compared to 17.0% in Davisboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Davisboro at 22%, compared to 8% in Cranston.
- The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Davisboro.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Davisboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranston | Davisboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 74 |
| White | 61 | 12 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Davisboro
- In Davisboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 5% in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 12% in Davisboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 0% in Davisboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 8% in Davisboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranston at 9% compared to 5% in Davisboro.
- In Davisboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Cranston.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranston | Davisboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 14.5% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Davisboro
- In Davisboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cranston at 24.9% compared to 16.2% in Davisboro.
- Davisboro has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 16.3% in Davisboro.
- Davisboro has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Cranston at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Davisboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranston | Davisboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 1.1% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 17.7% (338) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 36.0% (686) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 5.0% (95) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Davisboro
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Cranston and Davisboro at 1.1%.
- In Davisboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 16.1% in Cranston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Davisboro at 36.0%, compared to 13.4% in Cranston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 5.0% in Davisboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.