Demographics details for Cranston, RI vs Cullman, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cranston, RI vs Cullman, AL.
| Data | Cranston | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82,421 | 19,251 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $83,123 | $59,982 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Cranston vs Cullman
- In Cranston, the population is higher at 82,421, compared to 19,251 in Cullman.
- The median age in Cullman is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 39.9 years in Cranston.
- Cranston has a higher median income of $83,123 compared to $59,982 in Cullman.
- In Cullman, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Cranston.
- The poverty level is higher in Cullman at 12%, compared to 8% in Cranston.
- The unemployment rate in Cranston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.3% in Cullman.
Demographics
Demographics Cranston vs Cullman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cranston | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 92 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cranston vs Cullman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cranston at 5% compared to 1% in Cullman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cullman at 92% compared to 61% in Cranston.
- The Asian population is larger in Cranston at 7% compared to 1% in Cullman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Cranston at 18% compared to 2% in Cullman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Cranston at 9% compared to 4% in Cullman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranston and Cullman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cranston | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 29.8% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cranston vs Cullman
- In Cullman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.1% in Cranston.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.9%.
- Cullman has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 13.5% in Cranston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cranston at 18.6% compared to 16.4% in Cullman.
- Cullman has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 29.8% in Cranston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cullman at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Cranston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cranston | Cullman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (930) | 0.7% (130) |
| High School Diploma | 16.1% (13,246) | 13.6% (2,614) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (11,048) | 13.0% (2,512) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.7% (20,330) | 22.1% (4,253) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cranston vs Cullman
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Cullman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 13.6% in Cullman.
- More residents in Cranston have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 13.0% in Cullman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cranston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.7% compared to 22.1% in Cullman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.