Demographics details for Crandall, TX vs Woodstock, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crandall, TX vs Woodstock, GA.
| Data | Crandall | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,641 | 37,350 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $101,829 | $100,913 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Crandall vs Woodstock
- The population in Woodstock is higher at 37,350, compared to 4,641 in Crandall.
- Residents in Crandall have a higher median age of 37.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Woodstock.
- Crandall has a higher median income of $101,829 compared to $100,913 in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crandall at 42.0% compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- The poverty level is identical in both Crandall and Woodstock at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Crandall is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Crandall vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crandall | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 11 |
| White | 75 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crandall vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Crandall.
- Crandall has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 69% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Crandall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Crandall at 19% compared to 9% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 3% in Crandall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crandall and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crandall | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 34.3% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crandall vs Woodstock
- More residents in Crandall report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crandall at 25.2% compared to 20.8% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crandall at 17.6% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crandall at 19.7% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crandall at 34.3% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Crandall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crandall | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (37) | 0.3% (107) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (622) | 8.2% (3,052) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (420) | 3.7% (1,375) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (594) | 32.9% (12,290) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crandall vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Crandall have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crandall hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Crandall have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 12.8% in Crandall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.