Demographics details for Crandall, TX vs Shirley, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crandall, TX vs Shirley, NY.
| Data | Crandall | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,641 | 26,498 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $101,829 | $109,821 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Crandall vs Shirley
- The population in Shirley is higher at 26,498, compared to 4,641 in Crandall.
- The median age in Shirley is higher at 40.4 years, compared to 37.3 years in Crandall.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821, compared to $101,829 in Crandall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crandall at 42.0% compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
- The poverty level is higher in Shirley at 6%, compared to 5% in Crandall.
- Shirley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Crandall.
Demographics
Demographics Crandall vs Shirley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crandall | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 75 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crandall vs Shirley
- In Shirley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Crandall.
- Crandall has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 56% in Shirley.
- In Shirley, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Crandall.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 19% in Crandall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shirley at 8%, compared to 3% in Crandall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crandall and Shirley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crandall | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 34.3% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crandall vs Shirley
- More residents in Crandall report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crandall at 25.2% compared to 21.1% in Shirley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crandall at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Shirley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Crandall at 19.7% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crandall at 34.3% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shirley at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Crandall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crandall | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (37) | 2.1% (555) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (622) | 22.2% (5,874) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (420) | 13.4% (3,542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (594) | 13.4% (3,547) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crandall vs Shirley
- In Shirley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Crandall.
- In Shirley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 13.4% in Crandall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shirley at 13.4%, compared to 9.0% in Crandall.
- In Shirley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 12.8% in Crandall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.