Demographics details for Cranberry township, PA vs Cochran, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Cranberry township, PA vs Cochran, GA.

Data Cranberry township Cochran
Population 31,560 4,647
Median Age 41.0 years 28.9 years
Median Income $100,000 $31,326
Married Families 72.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 4% 19%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Cranberry township vs Cochran

  • In Cranberry township, the population is higher at 31,560, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
  • Residents in Cranberry township have a higher median age of 41.0 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
  • Cranberry township has a higher median income of $100,000 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Cranberry township at 72.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 4% in Cranberry township.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Cranberry township and Cochran at 3.2%.

Demographics

Demographics Cranberry township vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Cranberry township Cochran
Black 3 53
White 90 40
Asian 4 2
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 1 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Cranberry township vs Cochran

  • In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 3% in Cranberry township.
  • Cranberry township has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 40% in Cochran.
  • The Asian population is larger in Cranberry township at 4% compared to 2% in Cochran.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Cranberry township and Cochran at 2%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cochran at 3%, compared to 1% in Cranberry township.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cranberry township and Cochran at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Cranberry township Cochran
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.7%
Depression Data is updating% 21.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 20.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 13.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 38.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Cranberry township vs Cochran

  • In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cochran at 21.8% versus 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochran at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Cranberry township Cochran
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.2% (54)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.2% (569)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.1% (703)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.7% (592)

Education Levels Comparison: Cranberry township vs Cochran

  • In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • In Cochran, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.
  • In Cochran, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Cranberry township.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.