Demographics details for Crab orchard, KY vs Simpsonville, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crab orchard, KY vs Simpsonville, SC.

Data Crab orchard Simpsonville
Population 743 26,748
Median Age 38.9 years 37.8 years
Median Income $27,721 $79,937
Married Families 36.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 16% 7%
Unemployment Rate 6.1 3.9

Population Comparison: Crab orchard vs Simpsonville

  • The population in Simpsonville is higher at 26,748, compared to 743 in Crab orchard.
  • Residents in Crab orchard have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 37.8 years in Simpsonville.
  • Simpsonville has a higher median income of $79,937, compared to $27,721 in Crab orchard.
  • In Simpsonville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Crab orchard.
  • Crab orchard has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 7% in Simpsonville.
  • The unemployment rate in Crab orchard is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.9% in Simpsonville.

Demographics

Demographics Crab orchard vs Simpsonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crab orchard Simpsonville
Black 1 21
White 89 66
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 7 7
Two or More Races 3 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Crab orchard vs Simpsonville

  • In Simpsonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 1% in Crab orchard.
  • Crab orchard has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 66% in Simpsonville.
  • In Simpsonville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Crab orchard.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Crab orchard and Simpsonville at 7%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Simpsonville at 5%, compared to 3% in Crab orchard.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crab orchard and Simpsonville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crab orchard Simpsonville
Mental Health Not Good 22.8% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 18.3% 9.6%
Depression 32.5% 19.9%
Smoking 30.6% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 17.8%
Obesity 42.0% 31.9%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crab orchard vs Simpsonville

  • More residents in Crab orchard report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 15.2% in Simpsonville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Crab orchard at 32.5% compared to 19.9% in Simpsonville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crab orchard at 30.6% compared to 13.5% in Simpsonville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Simpsonville at 17.8% compared to 13.9% in Crab orchard.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Crab orchard at 42.0% compared to 31.9% in Simpsonville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Crab orchard at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Simpsonville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crab orchard Simpsonville
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.8% (225)
High School Diploma 25.8% (192) 14.4% (3,847)
Less than High School 26.9% (200) 6.1% (1,645)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.6% (19) 21.5% (5,741)

Education Levels Comparison: Crab orchard vs Simpsonville

  • In Simpsonville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Crab orchard.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crab orchard hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 14.4% in Simpsonville.
  • More residents in Crab orchard have less than a high school education at 26.9% compared to 6.1% in Simpsonville.
  • In Simpsonville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 2.6% in Crab orchard.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.