Demographics details for Crab orchard, KY vs Port gibson, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crab orchard, KY vs Port gibson, MS.

Data Crab orchard Port gibson
Population 743 1,206
Median Age 38.9 years 47.3 years
Median Income $27,721 $24,773
Married Families 36.0% 22.0%
Poverty Level 16% 30%
Unemployment Rate 6.1 5.3

Population Comparison: Crab orchard vs Port gibson

  • The population in Port gibson is higher at 1,206, compared to 743 in Crab orchard.
  • The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 38.9 years in Crab orchard.
  • Crab orchard has a higher median income of $27,721 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Crab orchard at 36.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 16% in Crab orchard.
  • The unemployment rate in Crab orchard is higher at 6.1%, compared to 5.3% in Port gibson.

Demographics

Demographics Crab orchard vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crab orchard Port gibson
Black 1 82
White 89 12
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 3 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Crab orchard vs Port gibson

  • In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 1% in Crab orchard.
  • Crab orchard has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
  • Both Crab orchard and Port gibson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Crab orchard at 7% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port gibson at 6%, compared to 3% in Crab orchard.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crab orchard and Port gibson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crab orchard Port gibson
Mental Health Not Good 22.8% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 18.3% 16.0%
Depression 32.5% 20.0%
Smoking 30.6% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 10.2%
Obesity 42.0% 50.5%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crab orchard vs Port gibson

  • More residents in Crab orchard report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 19.0% in Port gibson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Crab orchard at 32.5% compared to 20.0% in Port gibson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crab orchard at 30.6% compared to 24.8% in Port gibson.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Crab orchard at 13.9% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 42.0% in Crab orchard.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 21.0% in Crab orchard.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crab orchard Port gibson
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.5% (6)
High School Diploma 25.8% (192) 9.8% (118)
Less than High School 26.9% (200) 13.3% (160)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.6% (19) 21.2% (256)

Education Levels Comparison: Crab orchard vs Port gibson

  • In Port gibson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Crab orchard.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crab orchard hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
  • More residents in Crab orchard have less than a high school education at 26.9% compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
  • In Port gibson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 2.6% in Crab orchard.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.