Demographics details for Crab orchard, KY vs Mullica hill, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Crab orchard, KY vs Mullica hill, NJ.

Data Crab orchard Mullica hill
Population 743 4,454
Median Age 38.9 years 41.0 years
Median Income $27,721 $123,265
Married Families 36.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 16% 4%
Unemployment Rate 6.1 3.2

Population Comparison: Crab orchard vs Mullica hill

  • The population in Mullica hill is higher at 4,454, compared to 743 in Crab orchard.
  • The median age in Mullica hill is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 38.9 years in Crab orchard.
  • Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265, compared to $27,721 in Crab orchard.
  • In Mullica hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 36.0% in Crab orchard.
  • Crab orchard has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Crab orchard is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.

Demographics

Demographics Crab orchard vs Mullica hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Crab orchard Mullica hill
Black 1 11
White 89 74
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 7 4
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Crab orchard vs Mullica hill

  • In Mullica hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in Crab orchard.
  • Crab orchard has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 74% in Mullica hill.
  • In Mullica hill, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Crab orchard.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Crab orchard at 7% compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mullica hill at 7%, compared to 3% in Crab orchard.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crab orchard and Mullica hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Crab orchard Mullica hill
Mental Health Not Good 22.8% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 18.3% 7.9%
Depression 32.5% 20.9%
Smoking 30.6% 10.3%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 20.0%
Obesity 42.0% 27.7%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Crab orchard vs Mullica hill

  • More residents in Crab orchard report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Crab orchard at 32.5% compared to 20.9% in Mullica hill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Crab orchard at 30.6% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 13.9% in Crab orchard.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Crab orchard at 42.0% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Crab orchard at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Mullica hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Crab orchard Mullica hill
No Schooling 0.1% (1) 0.7% (33)
High School Diploma 25.8% (192) 12.9% (576)
Less than High School 26.9% (200) 5.5% (244)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 2.6% (19) 36.2% (1,612)

Education Levels Comparison: Crab orchard vs Mullica hill

  • In Mullica hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Crab orchard.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Crab orchard hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
  • More residents in Crab orchard have less than a high school education at 26.9% compared to 5.5% in Mullica hill.
  • In Mullica hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 2.6% in Crab orchard.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.