Demographics details for Crab orchard, KY vs Graham, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Crab orchard, KY vs Graham, NC.
| Data | Crab orchard | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 743 | 17,856 |
| Median Age | 38.9 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $27,721 | $51,482 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Crab orchard vs Graham
- The population in Graham is higher at 17,856, compared to 743 in Crab orchard.
- Residents in Crab orchard have a higher median age of 38.9 years compared to 36.8 years in Graham.
- Graham has a higher median income of $51,482, compared to $27,721 in Crab orchard.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Crab orchard at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Graham.
- Crab orchard has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Graham.
- The unemployment rate in Crab orchard is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.5% in Graham.
Demographics
Demographics Crab orchard vs Graham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Crab orchard | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 23 |
| White | 89 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Crab orchard vs Graham
- In Graham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 1% in Crab orchard.
- Crab orchard has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 51% in Graham.
- In Graham, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Crab orchard.
- Graham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 7% in Crab orchard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Graham at 8%, compared to 3% in Crab orchard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Crab orchard and Graham at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Crab orchard | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.3% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 32.5% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 30.6% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Crab orchard vs Graham
- More residents in Crab orchard report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 18.3% in Graham.
- Depression is more prevalent in Crab orchard at 32.5% compared to 25.2% in Graham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Crab orchard at 30.6% compared to 20.5% in Graham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Graham at 15.9% compared to 13.9% in Crab orchard.
- Obesity rates are higher in Crab orchard at 42.0% compared to 38.9% in Graham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Crab orchard at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Graham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Crab orchard | Graham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 1.3% (227) |
| High School Diploma | 25.8% (192) | 16.7% (2,976) |
| Less than High School | 26.9% (200) | 16.2% (2,884) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.6% (19) | 14.6% (2,610) |
Education Levels Comparison: Crab orchard vs Graham
- In Graham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.1% in Crab orchard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Crab orchard hold a high school diploma at 25.8% compared to 16.7% in Graham.
- More residents in Crab orchard have less than a high school education at 26.9% compared to 16.2% in Graham.
- In Graham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 2.6% in Crab orchard.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.