Demographics details for Cowden, IL vs Surprise, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cowden, IL vs Surprise, AZ.
| Data | Cowden | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 507 | 154,198 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,750 | $87,756 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Cowden vs Surprise
- The population in Surprise is higher at 154,198, compared to 507 in Cowden.
- The median age in Surprise is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 30.9 years in Cowden.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756, compared to $43,750 in Cowden.
- In Surprise, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cowden.
- The poverty level is higher in Surprise at 13%, compared to 10% in Cowden.
- The unemployment rate in Cowden is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Surprise.
Demographics
Demographics Cowden vs Surprise provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cowden | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 89 | 63 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Cowden vs Surprise
- In Surprise, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Cowden.
- Cowden has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 63% in Surprise.
- In Surprise, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cowden.
- Surprise has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 5% in Cowden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Surprise at 9%, compared to 3% in Cowden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Cowden and Surprise at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cowden | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cowden vs Surprise
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Cowden and Surprise at 17.0%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cowden at 22.3% compared to 20.1% in Surprise.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cowden at 19.5% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 18.2% in Cowden.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cowden at 36.5% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Surprise at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Cowden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cowden | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (3) | 0.5% (754) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (114) | 13.7% (21,050) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (29) | 7.6% (11,792) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (35) | 19.9% (30,735) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cowden vs Surprise
- A higher percentage of residents in Cowden have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cowden hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 13.7% in Surprise.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Surprise at 7.6%, compared to 5.7% in Cowden.
- In Surprise, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 6.9% in Cowden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.