Demographics details for Cowden, IL vs Kerman, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cowden, IL vs Kerman, CA.
| Data | Cowden | Kerman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 507 | 16,208 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 27.8 years |
| Median Income | $43,750 | $53,956 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Cowden vs Kerman
- The population in Kerman is higher at 16,208, compared to 507 in Cowden.
- Residents in Cowden have a higher median age of 30.9 years compared to 27.8 years in Kerman.
- Kerman has a higher median income of $53,956, compared to $43,750 in Cowden.
- In Kerman, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cowden.
- The poverty level is higher in Kerman at 12%, compared to 10% in Cowden.
- Kerman has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 4.2% in Cowden.
Demographics
Demographics Cowden vs Kerman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cowden | Kerman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | -12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 81 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 22 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Cowden vs Kerman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Cowden at 2% compared to 0% in Kerman.
- Cowden has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to -12% in Kerman.
- In Kerman, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Cowden.
- Kerman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 81%, compared to 5% in Cowden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kerman at 22%, compared to 3% in Cowden.
- In Kerman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Cowden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cowden | Kerman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 18.0% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.1% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cowden vs Kerman
- In Kerman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.0% in Cowden.
- Depression is more prevalent in Cowden at 22.3% compared to 18.0% in Kerman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cowden at 19.5% compared to 17.3% in Kerman.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cowden at 18.2% compared to 13.1% in Kerman.
- Kerman has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.5% in Cowden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kerman at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Cowden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cowden | Kerman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (3) | 4.3% (694) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (114) | 10.4% (1,690) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (29) | 45.2% (7,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (35) | 7.3% (1,177) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cowden vs Kerman
- In Kerman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.6% in Cowden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cowden hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 10.4% in Kerman.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kerman at 45.2%, compared to 5.7% in Cowden.
- In Kerman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 6.9% in Cowden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.