Demographics details for Cowden, IL vs Fultondale, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Cowden, IL vs Fultondale, AL.
| Data | Cowden | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 507 | 9,677 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,750 | $72,741 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Cowden vs Fultondale
- The population in Fultondale is higher at 9,677, compared to 507 in Cowden.
- The median age in Fultondale is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 30.9 years in Cowden.
- Fultondale has a higher median income of $72,741, compared to $43,750 in Cowden.
- In Fultondale, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 29.0% in Cowden.
- Cowden has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Fultondale.
- The unemployment rate in Cowden is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fultondale.
Demographics
Demographics Cowden vs Fultondale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Cowden | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 35 |
| White | 89 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Cowden vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 35% compared to 2% in Cowden.
- Cowden has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 51% in Fultondale.
- In Fultondale, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Cowden.
- Fultondale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Cowden.
- Both Cowden and Fultondale have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Cowden at 1% compared to 0% in Fultondale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Cowden | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 22.3% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Cowden vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.0% in Cowden.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fultondale at 23.9% versus 22.3% in Cowden.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Cowden at 19.5% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- Binge drinking is more common in Cowden at 18.2% compared to 16.4% in Fultondale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Cowden at 36.5% compared to 36.4% in Fultondale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fultondale at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Cowden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Cowden | Fultondale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (3) | 1.3% (121) |
| High School Diploma | 22.5% (114) | 17.1% (1,657) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (29) | 10.4% (1,005) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (35) | 18.1% (1,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Cowden vs Fultondale
- In Fultondale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Cowden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Cowden hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 17.1% in Fultondale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fultondale at 10.4%, compared to 5.7% in Cowden.
- In Fultondale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 6.9% in Cowden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.